Tunnel Vision

After reading Current Status and Next Rollout: Which NYC Subway Lines Have Wireless Service, you asked Does underground signal really matter for safety & equity?

Connectivity, Safety, and Equity in Underground Transit

1 min read

TL;DRUnderground cell service isn't just convenience—it's about safety, accessibility, and equity across all communities.

Connectivity, Safety, and Equity in Underground Transit

You might think cell service in subway tunnels is just a convenience. But for many riders, it's also about safety, access, and justice.

Imagine you're on a late-night train, stuck in a tunnel for a few minutes. Without signal, you can't call for help if you see trouble or feel unsafe. That silence matters, especially in stations and edges where crime, harassment, or medical emergencies sometimes happen.

Then there's equity. Some neighborhoods already suffer from weak cell coverage above ground. If tunnel signal only benefits lines serving wealthier areas, it widens the digital gap. Boldyn and the MTA say they're aiming to expand service across all 418 miles of tunnels to reach historically underserved corridors.

There's also evidence that subway accessibility is uneven across the city by race, income, or geography. Some stations are ADA-inaccessible. Some neighborhoods have fewer lines or harder transfers. A strong wireless network can't fix those infrastructure gaps, but it becomes a quality-of-service issue once you're underground.

Add it all up: underground connectivity isn't a luxury. It's part of making transit safer, more reliable, and fairer.

Take Action

Discuss

If the embed is blocked by the forum’s security policy, open the topic here.

Published October 9, 2025

Mark Okafor is a contributor for Tunnel Vision.

This article is part of the Connectivity series.

Connectivity, Safety, and Equity in Underground Transit | Tunnel Vision NYC