Tunnel Vision

After reading Fare Evasion & Free Rides: Who's Shouldering the $3 Cost?, you asked How is the MTA fighting evasion?

The MTA's Evasion Crackdown: Deterrence, Design, Disparity

1 min read

TL;DRMTA retrofits turnstiles, deploys gate guards, and tests smart gates to reduce evasion, though equity concerns remain.

How the MTA is (really) fighting evasion — and whose backs it's on

The MTA isn't just raising barriers, it's reengineering the fare system. Across 100+ stations, about 1,400 turnstiles have been retrofitted to block the common "back-cocking" trick, and those stations saw an 80 % drop in that kind of abuse. The agency is also piloting delayed egress at emergency exits (a 15-second delay saw a 38 % drop in exit-based evasion at test sites) and plans to expand to 150 stations.

On top of the hardware, the MTA is deploying "smart" fare gates": tall, sensor-equipped glass barriers meant to resist climbing, forcing open, or tailgating, in 20 stations to see which design works best. Meanwhile, gate guards are now assigned at 200+ stops, where those stations logged 36 % lower evasion after deployment.

Still, critics argue that the burden falls hardest on riders least able to absorb friction. Enforcement campaigns, summonses, and tech-heavy barriers may dissuade casual evaders, but the question of who pays for this crackdown is far from settled.

Take Action

Discuss

If the embed is blocked by the forum’s security policy, open the topic here.

Published October 2, 2025

Rachel Kowalski is a contributor for Tunnel Vision.

This article is part of the Fares series.

The MTA's Evasion Crackdown: Deterrence, Design, Disparity | Tunnel Vision NYC